The End of the Free World Part 2 from Planck's Constant

who would have thought that the End of the World would be so spectacular?

End of the World
Photo by: parade in the sky

I originally wrote this prediction on 9 Feb 2006 when my blog was hosted on blogspot. Then today I read author Dan Simmons' message of his frightful encounter with a visitor from our future who describes the inevitable war with Islam.¹

On this same day I learned that the Belgian Parliament caved to Muslim sensitivities by allowing visitors to wear hijabs, breaking a longstanding tradition.²

Both of these recent readings aroused in me such a frisson of foreboding that I decided to instruct my readers to reread my February post's warnings; events which I thought would come to pass in a few years are now tumbling into place in a matter of months. When all of us are speaking Arabic you will not hear me say "I told you so" because you will be crawling so low in dhimmitude that the sound of my voice will not reach your ears.

There are 1.5 BILLION Muslims, but not all of the previous generations were Muslims. Most Muslims today come from peoples who were previously Christian, Zoroastrian, Hindu, whatever, who eventually had to accept Islam because living under Sharia as a dhimmi was unbearable.

There are only two possibilities:

We continue to accommodate Islam as the Belgians are doing.

We go to war against all of Islam.

You can no longer say you were not warned.

Excellent lessons on how to speak Arabic here. You will need this in order to be able to say "may Allah have mercy on my dhimmi soul".

Notes

(1):

Dan Simmons, April 2006 Message from Dan
I tried to relax. “What do you want to talk about?” I said.
“The Century War,” said the Time Traveler.

I blinked and tried to remember some history. “You mean the Hundred Year War? Fifteenth Century? Fourteenth? Sometime around there. Between... France and England? Henry V? Kenneth Branagh? Or was it...”

“I mean the Century War with Islam,” interrupted the Time Traveler. “Your future. Everyone’s.” He was no longer smiling. Without asking, or offering to pour me any, he stood, refilled his Scotch glass, and sat again. He said, “It was important to me to come back to this time early on in the struggle. Even if only to remind myself of how unspeakably blind you all were.”

“You mean the War on Terrorism,” I said.

“I mean the Long War with Islam,” he said. “The Century War. And it’s not over yet where I come from. Not close to being over.”

“You can’t have a war with Islam,” I said. “You can’t go to war against a religion. Radical Islam, maybe. Jihadism. Some extremists. But not a... the... religion itself. The vast majority of Muslims in the world are peaceloving people who wish us no harm. I mean... I mean... the very word ‘Islam’ means ‘Peace.’”

“So you kept telling yourselves,” said the Time Traveler. His voice was very low but there was a strange and almost frightening edge to it. “But the ‘peace’ in ‘Islam’ means ‘Submission.’ You’ll find that out soon enough”

(2):

Brussels Journal, 21 Apr 2006, Brussels Welcomes Hijabs in Parliament
the Belgian parliament changed a longstanding rule concerning the wearing of headgear (hijabs) by visitors and members in the House. Since the establishment of the Belgian Parliament it has been the rule that members of the public who follow parliamentary proceedings from the visitors’ seats remove their hats and caps as a sign of respect for the House and the democratic principles it embodies. The rule has never been questioned, not in the early 20th century when working people habitually wore caps and politely removed them in church and when visiting Parliament; not in the 1950s and ’60s when women generally wore hats as a sign of deference in church, but removed them as a sign of deference when attending proceedings in Parliament; not throughout all the decades when priests and nuns were familiar figures in Belgium’s streets and the nuns wore veils and habits.
Yesterday, however, a majority in Parliament voted to change the rule so as to exempt Muslim women from the obligation to remove their headgear as a token of respect when attending sessions in Parliament. Thus a longstanding tradition was broken, and a new form of discrimination introduced. For the rule still requires that visitors dress appropriately.

...

Consequently April 20th 2006 became a significant date in the three-way culture war: whilst the secularists complete their conquest over religious tradition through institutional change, a conquest which has taken them half a century to achieve, they are already surrendering to the Muslims in the latter’s conquest of the West through social dominance and with the collaboration of politically correct elites. Headscarves in Parliament, and Turkish loaves instead of the Eucharist at the funeral of a boy who was murdered by Muslims: these are powerful signs. As the “enlightened” triumph over the elimination of the last vestiges of Christianity, the religious vacuum in Belgian society has already been filled.